Fortified Cereals: The SHOCKING Truth!

Filings in YOUR Cereal?

Corporations pumping YOU full of POISON

Not all cereals are bad; that's for sure. Processed cereals may be "fortified" in ways you don't expect. You can try the experiment shown in this video yourself and try to confirm or negate its results. While its conclusions may seem a bit melodramatic, it vividly demonstrates the fortification that you don't want in your food.

If you want to correct the damage done click here!

Scientists: Humans are 'an infection' and Ebola is Earth's immune response to consume all the human 'meat'

(NaturalNews) If you haven't yet read The Hot Zone by Richard Preston, a non-fiction book published in 1994, you're way behind the curve on the truth about Ebola.

This book reveals all sorts of astonishing truths about Ebola which have since been buried or distorted by a modern-day government operating in total denial. For example, the book documents numerous cases of an Ebola variant spreading via airborne routes among monkeys housed in completely separate rooms in level-4 biohazard facilities run by the U.S. Army. The fact that Ebola could spread through the air was known in the 1990s (but is ridiculously denied by the CDC today).

The Hot Zone was written by Richard Preston after he conducted dozens of interviews with virologists, scientists and doctors, many of which spent time on the front lines in Africa, hunting for the origins of Ebola. One scientist spent so much time looking for Ebola carriers in caves that he was jokingly called "Dr. Bat S#!t." The book also documents the outbreak of Ebola Reston in a U.S. Army primate laboratory, and it describes the heroic efforts to contain that outbreak.

But one of the most disturbing and fascinating passages in the book appears on page 310 in the soft cover print edition. This passage appears to be an aggregation of the thinking of the many scientists interviewed by Preston. (I don't think these words are the direct opinion of Preston himself.) Keep in mind that at the time this passage was written -- the 1990's -- the world population stood at only around five billion people. AIDS had just recently emerged, and global concern about deadly viral pandemics was on the rise.

Here's what Preston wrote in 1994:

Humans are "an infection" and Ebola is Earth's "immune response"

The emergence of AIDS, Ebola, and any number of other rainforest agents appears to be a natural consequence of the ruin of the tropical biosphere. The emerging viruses are surfacing from ecologically damaged parts of the Earth...

In a sense, the earth is mounting an immune response against the human species. It is beginning to react to the human parasite, the flooding infection of people, the dead spots of concrete all over the planet, the cancerous rot-outs in Europe, Japan and the United States, thick with replicating primates [i.e. humans], the colonies enlarging and spreading and threatening to shock the biosphere with mass extinctions.

Perhaps the biosphere does not "like" the idea of five billion humans. Or it could also be said that the extreme amplification of the human race, which has occurred only in the past hundred years or so, has suddenly produced a very large quantity of meat, which is sitting everywhere in the biosphere and may not be able to defend itself against a life form that might want to consume it...

The earth's immune system, so to speak, has recognized the presence of the human species and is starting to kick in. The earth is attempting to rid itself of an infection by the human parasite.

"Humans are the parasite and Ebola is the cure..."

If all this sounds like a scene out of The Matrix, that's because Agent Smith utters this same line of reasoning, almost word for word, to Morpheus. "Humans are a disease, and WE are the cure!" (The "we" referring to the machines, in the case of the film.)

This classification of humans as a disease "infecting" the planet is surprisingly prevalent among many scientists and environmentalists today. From their point of view, it is difficult to observe the global destruction of the biosphere, the pillaging of natural resources and the collapse of natural freshwater resources without reaching the conclusion that there are simply too many people on this planet who are consuming too many limited resources.

This realization has given rise to the discussion that the circulating strain of Ebola observed today may indeed be a bioengineered weapon whose purpose is to radically reduce the world population of human beings. After all, some of the most influential people in the world -- like Bill Gates and Ted Turner -- continue to openly call for sharp reductions in global population in order to save the planet from the destructive ways of the human race.

World's top virologists warn that this Ebola is far more dangerous than any previous Ebola

Ebola expert Dr. Michael Osterholm has also gone public with a worrisome declaration that this strain of Ebola is far worse than any strain of Ebola we've witnessed before. Click here to watch his video where he describes why today's Ebola strain is so different and so much more dangerous than any previously known strain.

On top of that, former U.S. Army virologist Dr. Jahrling has just gone public with a similar warning about the increased danger of the circulating strain of Ebola. As WashingtonsBlog.com reports: [1]

Another top Ebola expert -- chief scientist at the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and discoverer of the Reston strain of Ebola (Dr. Peter Jahrling) – said last week that this strain of Ebola appears to be more virulent than other strains we've seen, producing a much higher viral load much quicker than other strains.

Is it possible that this strain of Ebola is far more dangerous precisely because it has been tinkered with -- "weaponized" -- with a specific purpose in mind?

Scientist says Ebola is a bioengineered weapon

The idea that Ebola might be a genetically engineered bioweapon was openly discussed by a top Liberian scientist named Dr. Cyril Broderick, who published a front-page story in the Liberian Observer containing the astonishing statement, "Ebola is a genetically modified organism (GMO)."

That article is still viewable at this link, in which Broderick goes on to assert that the U.S. Dept. of Defense has been using African women and children for bioweapons experiments.

In his own words, he talks about "...the existence of an American Military-Medical-Industry that conducts biological weapons tests under the guise of administering vaccinations to control diseases and improve the health of black Africans overseas."

The book The Hot Zone confirms that infectious agents like Ebola were once developed into bioweapons by the United States Army, but it points out that such research was outlawed by President Nixon in 1969.

U.S. military bioweapons research moved offshore?

This may explain why such research may be taking place in Africa. Conducting bioweapons research on the African continent, away from the prying eyes of the U.S. media, allows such operations to be conducted in a covert manner with the necessary deniability.

Strategically, there is no question that a world power nation like the United States would never abandon its intellectual capital into bioweapons research. The banning of the research by President Nixon was merely a public relations and diplomacy strategy in much the same way that nuclear nations frequently talk about "disarmament" while building more nuclear missiles.

No nation can strategically allow itself to be wholly unprepared against an Ebola attack from an enemy nation, therefore Ebola bioweapons research must always be continued in order to research potential defenses against it (even if the bioweapon is never intended to be used as a tool of aggression). The only rational conclusion here is that the Pentagon never really halted Ebola bioweapons research but instead moved it offshore.

And that is potentially where Africa enters the picture. What better place to research the GMO Ebola bioweapon than in a continent where any accidental releases or outbreaks can be blamed on bats and monkeys? Ebola, after all, cycles naturally in African mammals. So any experiment that goes awry can simply be blamed on Mother Nature, whom some scientists have begun calling a "serial killer."

You are not being told the truth about Ebola, bioweapons and the depopulation agenda

There is no absolute proof that this current Ebola outbreak is an intentional release of a doomsday depopulation weapon, but there are plenty of reasons to suspect such a scenario needs to be explored.

Some of the signs in support of this reluctant conclusion include the U.S. government's determined unwillingness to isolate the USA from Ebola by controlling air traffic and national borders. The government's mishandling of Ebola in Dallas also smacks of something far beyond incompetence, bordering on "intentional failures." (Who the heck tells a nurse to treat a BSL-4 infected patient while wearing level-3 protective gear?)

The coming global debt collapse, California water collapse, food shortages and social unrest are all red alert triggers to a government that realizes it is losing control of the population. From the point of view of a totalitarian government, a deadly Ebola outbreak solves many problems all at once: it reduces the number of so-called "useless eaters" who tend to riot in the streets, it puts the government in an immediate position of medical martial law, and it allows the government to present itself as the savior of civilization while demanding absolute obedience from a population that will soon be begging for quarantines, vaccines and emergency food supplies.

There is no way to know for sure if today's Ebola outbreak is accidental or intentional, but if you ask the question "who benefits from an Ebola outbreak?" some of the answers become rather obvious.

Learn more Ebola truth in the book "The Hot Zone" by Richard Preston. And learn the truth about pandemic preparedness with all the free MP3 audio files at www.BioDefense.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047358_Ebola_outbreak_human_meat_immune_response.html#ixzz3GtAKzpk4

Fluoridated water calcifies your arteries: study

(NaturalNews) A major promoter of heart disease in the U.S. today could be a chemical that the government has been intentionally dumping into the water supply for decades on the premise that it prevents tooth decay. Fluoride, according to a new study published in the journal Toxicology, shows demonstrated cardiotoxic effects, which include the calcification and hardening of arteries.

Researchers from the University of Zaragoza in Spain looked at the effects of water fluoridation on the progression of vascular calcification in renal (kidney) disease. The team used real-world concentrations of fluoride as recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for optimal oral health -- 1.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) -- administering this amount to rats via water in the same way humans would receive it.

It was observed that, for five days, the rats, all of whom had experimental chronic kidney disease (CKD), experienced calcification of their aortic smooth muscle cells. The rats also experienced further declines in renal function as a result of exposure to fluoride, demonstrating the nephrotoxicity of this common water additive.

"[F]luoridation of drinking water... dramatically increased the incipient aortic calcification observed in rats with experimental chronic kidney disease," wrote the authors. "[T]he WHO's recommended concentrations in drinking water become nephrotoxic to CKD rats, thereby aggravating renal disease and making media vascular calcification significant."

90 percent of digested fluoride is taken up by intestines and distributed throughout body

Previous research, as noted in the new study, has confirmed that 90 percent or more of digested fluoride is absorbed through the intestines and distributed throughout the body to soft tissues, calcified structures and blood plasma. At WHO-recommended doses, fluoride can still get lodged throughout the body and remain there for many years.

In healthy individuals, plasma fluoride is cleared through the dual action of calcifying tissues and expelling through the kidneys. But in those with renal disease, the kidneys are not up to the task of removing fluoride from the body, greatly amplifying both the calcification process and the advancement of renal failure.

"Since atherosclerosis involves the gradual hardening and final calcification of the arteries with a form of calcium known as hydroxylapatite, fluoride's role in replacing hydroxyls within hydroxylapatite crystals to form fluorapatite can be considered enhancing the cardiotoxicity of these calcium deposits," wrote Sayer Ji for GreenMedInfo.

"[This is] due to the fact that fluorapatite is less soluble than hydroxylapatite and therefore more resistant to the body's demineralization mechanisms (or de-calcification with natural substances such as magnesium, hawthorn or vitamin K2)."

Tell your local water authority to do its homework and end water fluoridation

The time to end water fluoridation is now, as the mounting evidence couldn't be any clearer: Fluoride is extremely toxic, especially for those with pre-existing health conditions. Even at the "low" doses considered safe by the government, fluoride can have a dramatic impact on neurological function, brain chemistry and cardiovascular performance.

This is all extensively outlined in the scientific literature, and neatly put together by groups like the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) that continue to advocate for safe, fluoride-free water:
FluorideAlert.org.

Water authorities everywhere need to take note of the facts and decidedly put a stop to this outmoded and dangerous practice.

"Our findings could help to decide whether the use of fluoride to improve the dental health of the population through indiscriminate practices, such as adding it to municipal drinking water, should be reconsidered and should be replaced by a fluoridation policy based on the health status of individuals," concluded the authors.

Sources:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

http://www.greenmedinfo.com

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

http://fluoridealert.org

http://science.naturalnews.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/047357_water_fluoridation_calcification_cardiovascular_health.html#ixzz3Gt8z9l3H

Aspartame

Why is this poison still allowed?

It's all about politics... people!!!

Attorney Jim Turner is an expert on aspartame and its health impacts; and has been fighting it for four decades. He tells the story of how aspartame was approved for us in the United States even though its poisonous effects were well-documented. Aspartame contains three neurotoxins, any one of which could 

MS and Parkinson's symptoms from MSG and aspartame

The poisons found in artificial sweeteners and MSG

What do diet sodas and flavor-enhanced foods have in common?

As Dr. Gloria Gilbere explains, artificial sweeteners and MSG, found in many foods, are both excitotoxins. Excitotoxins are poisonous to the body: they release excessive neurotransmitters that damage nerve cells. The effects include heart palpitations, symptoms of MS and Parkinson's, and eye diseases. 

GMO Ticking Time Bomb

According to the FDA, you're too ignorant to know the difference 

"The FDA has argued that the average consumer is too ignorant to recognize the difference between a GMO labeled food and a non-GMO labeled food, and they'd make the wrong choice. And that's their stated reason for opposing GMO labeling." No testing. No labeling. No dent in the profits of Monsanto. In this first in a series of mini-documentary videos about GMOs, Gary Null delves into the reality of GMO health risks. 

What about fish?

Veterinary drugs in your catfish?

Something fishy is going on

Almost all seafood sold now comes from developing nations. It's cheaper and taking over the market. Eighty percent of all seafood sold now is imported. The FDA tests less than 1 percent of all imported foods. If you're going to eat fish, know the source and how imported fish can affect your health. Fished farmed in sewage! Yuck!

Bottom line folks... we must do something I used to do all of the time as a kid... "GO FISHING"!!!